License problem with JPGraph

[Josh Boyer]

On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 22:04 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 11:48 -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 09:55:09AM +0200, Steven Bakker wrote:
> >>>         Licensee) For non-commercial, open-source or educational use and
> >>>         JpGraph Professional License for commercial use.
> >>>
> >>> So QPL applies for (non-commercial || open-source || educational) use.
> >>> I'd say Fedora fits in the "open-source" category.
> >> I would read that as "no commercial open source"  || "educational", otherwise
> >> it makes no sense. Commercial and open source are not exclusive.
> > 
> > FYI this package has been pulled already.
> 
> Doesn't that require a announcement? We did that for Xara.

/me shrugs

I didn't explicitly do the pull.  An announcement is certainly
justified, I just would have thought the packager would do it.

josh