KDE-LiveCD: gparted or qtparted?

Sebastian Vahl ml at deadbabylon.de
Wed Apr 18 21:33:46 UTC 2007


We (KDE-SIG) want to include one of these partitionin tools.
qtparted would be the best choice because it is qt. But personally I've
only used gparted the last time (years). For me it was working better.

Also the described functionality differs:
gparted: http://gparted.sourceforge.net/features.php
qtparted: http://qtparted.sourceforge.net/features.en.html

So the question here is: Are there good reasons for choosing qtparted
instead of gparted? Or is gtparted equal in functionality?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070418/20808c7a/attachment.sig>

More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list