KDE-LiveCD: gparted or qtparted?

Sebastian Vahl ml at deadbabylon.de
Wed Apr 18 23:01:18 UTC 2007


Am Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:35:41 -0500
schrieb Callum Lerwick <seg at haxxed.com>:

> On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 23:33 +0200, Sebastian Vahl wrote:
> > So the question here is: Are there good reasons for choosing
> > qtparted instead of gparted? Or is gtparted equal in functionality?
> 
> SystemRescueCd switched from qtparted to gparted because qtparted went
> unmaintained since 2004. It appears it has recently been resurrected
> by Ark Linux though. gparted still seems to be ahead as far as
> functionality at the moment.

Mh. That would be a strong argument for gparted. Thanks.

Sebastian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070419/6ddfdb77/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list