Announcing Fedora 7 Test 4 (6.93)

Josh Boyer jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org
Mon Apr 30 16:29:11 UTC 2007


On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 21:38 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 20:24 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> Jesse Keating wrote:
> >> .  The Fedora KDE Live CD is specifically crafted to showcase
> >>> KDE, whilst the Fedora Live CD is specifically crafted to put Fedora's best 
> >>> foot forward in a reasonable usable desktop that will fit on a CD.  Again, it 
> >>> is not a "GNOME" LiveCD by any means.  Many parts of it are not gnome, 
> >>> especially areas like the browser.  A Fedora GNOME LiveCD could be crafted 
> >>> that showcases a pure GNOME desktop, like the KDE LiveCD.
> >> I already told you. This reasoning is flawed. The KDE live cd is not one 
> >> to showcase a "pure KDE desktop" just the GNOME live cd. It has Firefox 
> >> as the default browser just like GNOME.  It has dozens of GNOME 
> >> components. It might even have Evolution.
> > 
> > Huh?  Have you actually even tried the KDE live image?  Default browser
> > is konqueror, default mail client is kmail, ...  evolution and firefox
> > aren't even included.
> 
> I believe one of the KDE live releases did include Firefox. I haven't 
> tried the latest test release yet. I didn't claim that is has Evolution 
> now. Just that it is a possibility from the  discussions that happened. 
>   Gparted is going to be included in the final release. Fundamentally 
> there is no goal of purity of desktop environment which was my main point.

Your point, while it may be valid, is irrelevant.  The Board already
agreed on these names.  If you would like to have them changed, ask for
it to be discussed (again) at a Board meeting.  Or have it added to the
FESCo meeting if you would like to see their opinion on the matter and
have them go back to the Board if the decision differs from the current
state.

josh




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list