Kernel Modules in Fedora -x

[Jesse Keating]

On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 20:55:48 -0500
Josh Boyer <jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org> wrote:

> And I am more and more starting to think this might be a _good_ idea.
> Users that want modules we aren't willing to carry upstream can
> install the dkms "payload" (as you described it) for the module,
> build and install.
> 
> Some might think this is too technical a hurdle for users to clear,
> but I think it might be worth examining.  Care to draft a proposal for
> FESCo?  We could evaluate it at the same time we do dwmw2/f13's.


I'm not totally opposed to the idea, if the dkms system takes care of
the logic of building the module when new kernels land and such.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070803/6dfc9a1a/attachment.sig>