KDE: replacing dolphin

[Johan Cwiklinski]

Chitlesh GOORAH a écrit :
> On 8/24/07, Mark wrote:
>   
>> Adding d3lphin to the fedora repository sounds like a good idea to me
>> but don't delete dolphin or obsolete it with d3lphin.
>>     
>
> We can't ship both, can we ?
>
> d3lphin = dolphin + minor fixes + some minor enhancements
>
> Chitlesh
>   
Hello,

I think it will be better to name the package d3lphin, which should
'obsoletes' and 'provides' dolphin, as d3lphin is the official name, and
is officially a dolphin's fork.

Why should we keep existing dolphin as it ? It don't understand the
benefit, as its is unmaintained upstream, and it will also give the
maintainers some - in my opinion - useless work.

Have a good day,
Johan

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 249 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070824/ed74d79c/attachment.sig>