SInjdoc, gjdoc, and annotations

[Andrew Overholt]

On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 10:26 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> 
> On 8/28/07, Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 22:13 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > > Is gjdoc going to be made available for F-7, or am I stuck with
> the
> > > javadoc that is missing support for annotations?  Thanks,
> >
> > During F7 development we removed gjdoc in favour of sinjdoc for
> various
> > reasons (basically dead upstream, didn't support 1.5 features).  If
> > you'd like, you could resurrect gjdoc for F7.
> 
> I see.  In that case, it's probably better to add annotation support
> to sinjdoc.  I'll contact upstream and see if somebody is working on
> that; if not, I'll have a look at what needs to be done. 

Note that this will not matter for x86 and x86_64 for F8 with the
inclusion of IcedTea and will hopefully not matter much longer than F8
for ppc and other platforms.

Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070828/bde28697/attachment.sig>