source file audit - 2007-08-26
Kevin Fenzi
kevin at scrye.com
Thu Aug 30 17:03:48 UTC 2007
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:00:21 +0200
pertusus at free.fr (Patrice Dumas) wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:18:27AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> > Current Moodle maintainer here.
> >
> > Is it worth that much of a change to upstream? The list of
> > langpack dates is also manually maintained in the spec. I thought
> > it was our goal to break from upstream as little as possible. I'm
> > open to suggestions, but to me it seems just stripping moddle from
> > the script would be the simplest.
>
> In the end it is up to you. Just let it be in the script is right too,
> since it shows when the files are out of date.
Yeah, I can add it to an exception list or the like. I guess thats only
important if it's decided that I should mail maintainers...
Versions are handy tho for tracking when things changed, and also being
able to go back to specific versions if something breaks in a new one.
> Pat
kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070830/2e1536db/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list