Licensing guidelines changes

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Thu Aug 2 20:02:25 UTC 2007


On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:36:49 +0200
Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl> wrote:

> Last, you do realize this will effectively cause a mass rebuild? Is
> this a good moment in the release cycle for this tool-chain wise, or
> maybe packages should start updating the tags (which is most of the
> work), but hold off building until another moment?

We're quickly coming upon a mass rebuild need for a few things.

BuildID for debugging
ppc32 for incorrect compile flags leading to selinux denials
java for IceTea

and now for correct license text.

This is what I would call 'technical reason' for a mass rebuild (:

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070802/b269cb07/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list