Kernel Modules in Fedora -x

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Aug 3 20:48:57 UTC 2007


On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 15:36:30 -0500
Josh Boyer <jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org> wrote:

> There is a difference in having an arbitrary timeout because something
> didn't get upstreamed and having a module be orphaned.  If the
> maintainer is still fighting to get it upstream and it hasn't happened
> yet, I see no reason to arbitrarily tell them "too bad, you didn't
> meet the timeout."


Well, I didn't want the timeout to be a flat "sod off", I wanted it to
be another review point.  If they're still fighting and there is
progress, no reason not to extend it for another release.  IF they've
sat on their duff and done nothing, well...

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070803/9f0a81a5/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list