GPL and LGPL not acceptable for Fedora!
Hans de Goede
j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
Thu Aug 16 05:11:47 UTC 2007
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Hans de Goede wrote:
>> The version of the COPYING[.lib] file is not relevant if the sourcecoe doesn't
>> contain a version its GPL+ resp. LGPLv2+
> So if sourcecode doesn't mention a version but COPYING does, it's still
> interpreted as "or any later version?" Hm... that strikes me as odd.
Yes, atleast thats what Spot says and he is in charge of the license tags.
>> About GPL and LGPL. If libhandle is distributed as a seperate file under
>> /usr/lib, then the license tag would be:
>> License: GPL+ and LGPLv2+
> Yup that's it... I guess I'll look into making a -libs package in my
> spare time. :)
It really isn't all that hard, see mdbtools or wildmidi for examples.
More information about the fedora-devel-list