kde4 status?

Hans de Goede j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
Mon Aug 20 20:34:59 UTC 2007

Rex Dieter wrote:
> Adam Tkac wrote:
>> I think it would be better switch to KDE4 as soon as it possible (right
>> now) and don't try maintain KDE3 and KDE4 simulateously. Of course, it
>> will cause unstability, KDE team will be under heavy load, conservative
>> people could get heart attack etc. But I think new Fedora is more about
>> new features than about stability. Also if we switch to KDE4 now we
>> should discover more bugs and make upcomming KDE more stable. Bug-free
>> work is enemy of good work in our business :)
> While I agree with your sentiments, there is a basic level of functionality
> and reliability that is required to move forward with such a plan... which
> simply isn't there (yet), I'm afraid.
> <plug mode=shameless>
> Any interested parties (that means you! :) ) are welcome to join in with the
> KDE SIG to help move things forward,
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE
> As it is, things are moving much slower than I'd like.  We need a few more
> active/motivated folks to help with the heavy lifting.
> </plug>

Note: I'm not a KDE user, nor am I planning to become one (not that I dislike 
KDE, Ím just happy with GNOME). I've been known to do some heavy lifting 
though, and since kde4 would be an uber cool feature, I'm willing to help, can 
you define heavy lifting a bit more?



More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list