Rebuilds needed for Fedora 8
Todd Zullinger
tmz at pobox.com
Tue Aug 21 16:01:01 UTC 2007
Jesse Keating wrote:
> A less technical but a nonetheless important rebuild issue is
> correct package licensing. We have a goal to have all our packages
> with (a) correct License(s) tag in the spec file, and a build with
> that correct tag. I do not have the numbers currently as to how
> many still need updating, it is not a small number.
As of yesterday afternoon, it was 3148 out of 4667 (~67%). I posted a
full listing to fedora-legal-list here[1]:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2007-August/msg00032.html
The list is based on what's in CVS, not what's been built. (It's also
lower by 40 since I posted that.)
[1] If anyone can give me some pointers on getting a mapping of
packages <-> maintainers from the new packagedb, that'd be much
appreciated.
--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When you make a mistake, make amends immediately. It's easier to eat
crow while it's still warm.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 542 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070821/136aef23/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list