util-linux missing from build root

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Thu Aug 30 13:42:03 UTC 2007

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:04:52 -0400
seth vidal <skvidal at fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> This doesn't sound terrible to me. If we did provide a list of library
> requirements and application requirements that we define as minimal it
> would be easy to pass that list to yum to resolve and install.
> something to think about, anyway.

Can it be expressed as a comps group though?  Does yum comps module
handle that?

Also keep in mind that part of having the minimal buildroot was so that
when people rebuild packages on their own, they didn't have to hunt
down why their package didn't build right due to silent missing
BuildRequires.  That means we start with very little assumptions and
use the BuildRequires to build up exactly what we want around when this
package is built.

Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070830/571b9e1d/attachment.sig>

More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list