BIND will completely drop D-BUS dynamic forwarders table support
Callum Lerwick
seg at haxxed.com
Fri Dec 7 00:11:48 UTC 2007
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 07:25 -0600, Jima wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> > This is *exactly* what dnsmasq is designed for. From what I can tell,
> > the author added dbus support to dnsmasq *specifically* so
> > NetworkManager could use it. I'm not sure what's up with the disconnect
> > here. :)
>
> Maybe not NM specifically, but certainly conceptually:
>
> "Added method support for DBus (http://www.freedesktop.org/Software/dbus)
> This is a superior way to re-configure dnsmasq on-the-fly with different
> upstream nameservers, as the host moves between networks. DBus support
> must be enabled in src/config.h and should be considered experimental at
> this point. See DBus-interface for the specification of the DBus method
> calls supported."
http://osdir.com/ml/network.networkmanager.devel/2005-04/msg00023.html
http://osdir.com/ml/network.networkmanager.devel/2005-05/msg00012.html
http://osdir.com/ml/network.networkmanager.devel/2005-04/msg00036.html
The dnsmasq author was very eager to have dnsmasq used by NM back in
2005. I haven't found any explanation as to why it didn't happen.
Here's a nice fresh thread, it even links back to this one:
http://www.nabble.com/nm-with-dnsmasq--t4940689.html
They seem really dead set on sticking with bind. Seriously, why?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20071206/fede71de/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list