Re: Guidelines for creating subpackages?

[Rex Dieter <rdieter math unl edu>]

Christopher Stone wrote:

> All I am saying is that if we want Fedora to be used as a base
> distribution for other distributions, we need to start focusing a lot
> more as a community on making sub-packages for optional requirements.

I'm curious, can you describe precisely the reasoning from
1.  more subpkgs for optional components
...
X.  improves fedora as a base
X+1. profit!
?

It's not entirely clear to me that making subpkgs is really a (or the!)
major requirement for X.

-- Rex