Firefox 3 Beta 2 in Rawhide

drago01 drago01 at gmail.com
Sun Dec 23 12:39:38 UTC 2007


Andrew Farris wrote:
> drago01 wrote:
>   
>> On Dec 23, 2007 1:43 AM, Chuck Anderson <cra at wpi.edu> wrote:
>>     
>>> On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 12:16:40AM +0100, drago01 wrote:
>>>       
>>>> For me it refuses to load any site until I change
>>>> "network.dns.disableIPv6" to "true"
>>>> So I propose to make this the default ..
>>>>         
>>> Works fine for me without doing that.  Let's not supposedly "fix"
>>> things by crippling new functionality and discouraging adoption of new
>>> technology, shall we?  What is the real problem here?  We should be
>>> focused on fixing that instead.
>>>       
>> the problem is that it does not work with some ISP .. and thats not
>> something that we can fix that easily (well or we can try to add some
>> fallback logic)
>>     
>
> Is it perhaps 'prefering' IPv6 and you've configured an IPv6 address locally
> while your ISP won't respond properly to IPv6 -> IPv4 nat translation?  I'd
> suggest making sure your local network configuration has IPv6 disabled and see
> if that firefox now does not care whether IPv6 is not disabled.
>
> If your ISP misbehaves, try not letting IPv6 traffic out of your machine (don't
> configure an address for the family).  The application should not choose to try
> and generate IPv6 traffic if it is not told you have IPv6 connectivity.
>
>   
well my ISP is connected to a wireless router and I got the 
configuration over dhcp from the router. There seems to be indeed a ipv6 
adress assigned to the interface in question (dunno why maybe because 
the router does support ipv6 but the ISP does not).
nevertheless if ipv6 does not work it should atleast fall back to ipv4. 
I know how to deal with this but I doubt that all  other users affected 
will be able to deal with it. And a webbrowser _must_ work out of the 
box .. else they cannot even try to google for a solution etc.




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list