keeping all he proprietary stuff away from Fedora (Was: Re: Goodbye, Fedora)

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

On 23.02.2007 13:47, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:15:54 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> 
>> - if we had some kind backing for a non-free repo from Red Hat or some 
>> other "Big Company" when it comes to knocking of doors to ask questions 
>> like "Hi Adobe, may we include a Adobe Reader RPM in the non-free 
>> community repo foo? They would do some some minor adjustments to the RPM 
>> to make it perfectly work with Fedora; that best for both sides"
> ?? Contradictory. It's closed-source. Basically, you don't want to
> include it in that repo at all.

Well, or yet another repo (but that might be to confusing) -- that 
depends on the definition of "non-free" in this case.

CU
thl