Why is redhat-artwork multi-lib?

[Jeremy Katz]

On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 11:06 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 10:29 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > I don't think it is particularly difficult, but there are a number of 
> > constraints (like
> > keeping all trademarked logos in a separate package). What we need 
> > before making
> > any decisions here is a summary of the current situation (what "artwork" 
> > packages
> > do we have, how do they interact, also wrt to derived distributions, 
> > etc) and a list
> > of goals for a reorganization. I'm sure interested community members can 
> > take a
> > whack at that.
>  were you planning in changes in this area vis anaconda? 

One thing that was discussed a little at FUDCon was moving some of the
trademarked logo bits into a separate "branding" repository.

That doesn't really have much to do with redhat-artwork, though.
Historically speaking, redhat-artwork was created to contain all
Bluecurve bits (and could as well have been called "bluecurve-artwork",
it was just named prior to the name Bluecurve and with the thought of
letting the theme change over time...)

Jeremy