anaconda update time needs to be improved (really)

[Chuck Anderson]

On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 03:09:12PM +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> > I suppose that running ldconfig continously is not useful, it could
> > be done just once at the end of the upgrade.
> 
> Not quite I think. Other (later-run) scripts might use those libraries
> so ldconfig has to be be run before them so they can work. Perhaps those
> calls could be clustered into one, but I don't know whether this can be
> done without changes to RPM.

I wonder if ld.so could be changed to run the cache update as needed, 
on-the-fly?