Slightly OT: bad rap for Fedora, and realistic effects

[Brian Pepple]

On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 10:46 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Friday 23 February 2007 10:25, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> > > > * unclear role of FESCo, not enough steering -- instead: the drive
> > > > that "you don't need to be in FESCo to get something done",
> > >
> > > I don't even know what you mean by this.
> >
> > That's sad. But you're not listed as a FESCo member anyway.
> 
> That's unfortunate, as I was dragged back into FESCo recently.

My fault for forgetting to update the FESCo page for the the recent
FESCo additions.  I'll update the page accordingly.

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070223/42c463ff/attachment.sig>