Fedora 7
Ola Thoresen
redhat at olen.net
Fri Jan 5 16:09:30 UTC 2007
Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 15:54 +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 09:28:48AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
>>>
>>> http://live.gnome.org/NetworkManagerConfiguration
>>
>> Hmmm, looks like this kind of definition is going to have a hard time
>> working in real setups. Lemme give you some examples of what I use on
>> a regular basis:
>
> Which is why it's good to have feedback :) So at least the 'gateway'
> item needs to be re-thought, since that's route-based and not
> interface/connection specific underneath. Though to many users it
> appears so, because they do not have complex setups, the flexibility
> needs to be there underneath.
>
It is at least important to be able to add multiple addresses to one
(physical) interface.
I personally don't like the old eth0:0 eth0:1 (...), but prefer the new
iproute2 style, but I guess I can live with aliases as long as it is
easy to add/remove them.
Rgds.
--
_,--', _._.--._____
.--.--';_'-.', ";_ _.,-' Ola Thoresen
.'--'. _.' {`'-;_ .-.>.'
'-:_ ) / `' '=. It is easier to fix Unix
) > {_/, /~) than to live with Windows
|/ `^ .'
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list