Fedora Server Spin
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Sun Jan 14 13:54:07 UTC 2007
On Saturday 13 January 2007 19:21, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> As long as "base" is an order or two of magnitude more sane than what it
> currently is, fine by me.
>
> In fact, I think that what I'm hoping for (and what Seth could probably
> also agree) is that when you select base on a kickstart installation you
> don't get to have to install openldap (just an example, there are a lot
> more instances of this problems) without breaking dependencies.
Perhaps what we can do is move a few things over to @Core, allow base to have
some of the things other seem to want like network diag tools. Those that
want the barest possible can use @Core in kickstarts instead of @Base, and
grow from there.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070114/0431b5f0/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list