plans for long term support releases?
Rahul Sundaram
sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Wed Jan 17 09:11:22 UTC 2007
Thomas M Steenholdt wrote:
>>
> Right now it may be the same thing, but if Fedora continues to evolve to
> something *larger* than a bleeding edge RHEL/CentOS, as there's been
> much talk about recently (realistically or not?!?), it would be great to
> have something to handle these cases with a real Fedora.
I am not sure what bleeding edge RHEL means. Do you believe Fedora can
work out a even longer lifecycle? What exactly are the benefits to users?
> I completely agree that right now, for my servers, RHEL/CentOS is
> probably exactly what I'm looking for. And that's also why most my
> servers actually run RHEL today.
>
> Also, this may not be doable (right now or ever), I'm mentioning it as
> something to be *considered*, because there are enough of users out
> there who could do with longer periods of active maintenance for their
> servers.
Question though is about not just enough users but enough contributors
to do the work.
Rahul
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list