New VCS Choice; SCM SIG

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Tue Jan 23 06:27:04 UTC 2007


On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 06:59 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 21:46 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 21:07 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 06:33:17PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > >  
> > > > Right but we're talking at cross-purposes.  What I mean is, are we using
> > > > these now with the fedora-extras and fedora-core dist-cvs?  If so, what
> > > > are the commands you're running to do that?
> > > > 
> > > > Although we talk about branches with dist-cvs, there's no cvs branches
> > > > in the repository that I'm aware of.  So I'm wondering if Karel has some
> > > > commands that he's using now or if this is a "If we use real branches in
> > > > the next SCM, it'll give us the ability to do operation Xyz in a better
> > > > way."
> > > 
> > > Well, there's nothing to really prevent someone from using a branch for
> > > private development.  The buildsys won't build off of it, but you can
> > > commit stuff to a branch if you'd like.  And of course, there's also the
> > > tagging we _do_ use.  Which is similar to a CVS branch.  You can actually
> > > do the merge command using tag names too.
> > > 
> > > I can see some use cases for using branching with git, simply because
> > > branches are trivial to create and work with.
> > > 
> > Yeah -- branches in subversion and bazaar are trivial,
> How comes you consider branches in CVS to be more complex?
> 
> I for one (Many year's of CVS power-usage), have never found subversion
> branches easy to use (I've never used bazaar nor git).
> 
cvs doesn't separate the concept of tags and branches.  It also works on
individual files rather than whole trees.  It could just be a limitation
of my brain but those two things made branches a lot harder for me to
understand in cvs.

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070122/f8201400/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list