Fedora 7

Ola Thoresen redhat at olen.net
Fri Jan 5 16:09:30 UTC 2007


Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 15:54 +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 09:28:48AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
>>>
>>> http://live.gnome.org/NetworkManagerConfiguration
 >>
>> Hmmm, looks like this kind of definition is going to have a hard time
>> working in real setups.  Lemme give you some examples of what I use on
>> a regular basis:
> 
> Which is why it's good to have feedback :)  So at least the 'gateway'
> item needs to be re-thought, since that's route-based and not
> interface/connection specific underneath.  Though to many users it
> appears so, because they do not have complex setups, the flexibility
> needs to be there underneath.
> 

It is at least important to be able to add multiple addresses to one 
(physical) interface.
I personally don't like the old eth0:0 eth0:1 (...), but prefer the new 
iproute2 style, but I guess I can live with aliases as long as it is 
easy to add/remove them.



Rgds.




-- 
          _,--',   _._.--._____
   .--.--';_'-.', ";_      _.,-'   Ola Thoresen
  .'--'.  _.'    {`'-;_ .-.>.'
        '-:_      )  / `' '=.      It is easier to fix Unix
          ) >     {_/,     /~)     than to live with Windows
          |/               `^ .'




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list