Fedora 7

[Dan Williams]

On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 17:09 +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
> Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 15:54 +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 09:28:48AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> >>>
> >>> http://live.gnome.org/NetworkManagerConfiguration
>  >>
> >> Hmmm, looks like this kind of definition is going to have a hard time
> >> working in real setups.  Lemme give you some examples of what I use on
> >> a regular basis:
> > 
> > Which is why it's good to have feedback :)  So at least the 'gateway'
> > item needs to be re-thought, since that's route-based and not
> > interface/connection specific underneath.  Though to many users it
> > appears so, because they do not have complex setups, the flexibility
> > needs to be there underneath.
> > 
> 
> It is at least important to be able to add multiple addresses to one 
> (physical) interface.

Yep!  That's obviously required.

> I personally don't like the old eth0:0 eth0:1 (...), but prefer the new 

That format is vile.

> iproute2 style, but I guess I can live with aliases as long as it is 
> easy to add/remove them.

Dan