Fedora Server Spin

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Sun Jan 14 13:54:07 UTC 2007


On Saturday 13 January 2007 19:21, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> As long as "base" is an order or two of magnitude more sane than what it
> currently is, fine by me.
>
> In fact, I think that what I'm hoping for (and what Seth could probably
> also agree) is that when you select base on a kickstart installation you
> don't get to have to install openldap (just an example, there are a lot
> more instances of this problems) without breaking dependencies.

Perhaps what we can do is move a few things over to @Core, allow base to have 
some of the things other seem to want like network diag tools.  Those that 
want the barest possible can use @Core in kickstarts instead of @Base, and 
grow from there.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070114/0431b5f0/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list