plans for long term support releases?

[Jesse Keating]

On Wednesday 17 January 2007 04:36, Thomas M Steenholdt wrote:
> Of course. Things all have to add up.
> Still. is this even something we want for Fedora? It's quite possible
> that we just don't want to do it, for any number of the problems brought
> up throughout this thread. Then let's declare LTS out-of-scope for
> Fedora and move along. Otherwise, lets see what *could* be done about it.

I think many of us have declared this out of scope for Fedora, you just 
haven't moved on (:

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070117/298d2ba7/attachment.sig>