New VCS Choice; SCM SIG
Francois Romieu
romieu at fr.zoreil.com
Tue Jan 23 23:23:52 UTC 2007
Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> :
[...]
> already using Mercurial. Also see
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/VersionControl
FWIW:
Mercurial Pros:
* It appears possible to have representations of one thing be a copy
of another directory or repository on the same mercurial server that
maintains history and everything. This could be useful.
-> From the description, .git/objects/info/alternates could be advertised
as a similar feature for git.
* Mercurial developers are willing to add missing functionality if
that makes sense.
-> A 'grep -i fedora' on my archives of the git mailing list suggests
that this kind of question has not been raised here. As usual, the
mailing-list is very valuable.
-> The disk requirements of git deserves more explanations than a terse
"Higher disk space requirements" in the Cons section. Is it a matter
of running 'git repack' from time to time or something else, _lots_
of branches/refs ?
-> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/git-eval.txt is
outdated. It speaks of git version 1.2.4 which dates back to 03/2006
while the 1.4.x branch is used since 06/2006.
--
Ueimor
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list