"yum update" failure and resulting cleanup headaches.

Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Thu Jan 25 17:54:42 UTC 2007


Le jeudi 25 janvier 2007 à 10:38 -0600, Callum Lerwick a écrit :

> The having to rm /var/lib/__db.00* problem has been around since RH8.0,
> and has yet to be completely fixed. This is not yum's fault, its rpm. Or
> possibly, ultimately db4's fault. Or rpm using db4 incorrectly. Hell if
> I know, all I know is I want it !@#$ing fixed. I'm hoping the new
> community RPM upstream project can sort this out soon...

It'd be interesting to see how rpm fares with 2.6.19+ kernels. IIRC
recently in the course of investigating another problem Linus fixed some
code and wondered publicly if this longstanding bug wouldn't impact
stuff like bdb. And then several heavy bdb users (openldap…) piped in
they've been hunting an elusive corruption for a long time without
realising the problem may be kernel-side. And that latest Linus kernel
fixed it.

Looks suspiciously like the rpm thing.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070125/37f67659/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list