/etc/init.d in the default $PATH ?
Florin Andrei
florin at andrei.myip.org
Mon Jan 29 00:43:03 UTC 2007
Warren Togami wrote:
> Florin Andrei wrote:
>> So, what it the rationale for /etc/init.d not being in the default
>> $PATH, for root at least?
>>
>
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin
> /usr/bin/spamassassin
>
> Which should run when you run 'spamassassin'?
>
> Ambiguity is bad.
Correct.
OTOH, if all files in /etc/init.d would be named init-<service-name> or
something like that, then the ambiguity would disappear and the
/etc/init.d could be added to the default $PATH.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list