rsyslog in f8?

[Peter Vrabec]

Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 July 2007 14:41:00 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> The rsyslog package has been approved and is ready to enter the
>> collection. I just thought I would ask if anyone has any issues or
>> concerns with switching to rsyslog for default system logger in f8?
>>
>> See:
>>
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureRsyslog
>> and
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243831
>>
>> Would it be helpfull to get it pushed out for f7/devel without any
>> Obsoletes first so folks can test it? Or should we just replace
>> sysklogd in devel right off?
> 
> Instead of looking at this as a 'new default logger', perhaps it would be 
> better to look at this as a 'rsyslogd is obsoleting sysklogd'.  Think of it 
> purely within the scope of one package is replacing the other, due to things 
> like sysklogd being dead upstream. In that context, we can do the replacement 
> now and be happy.
> 
> It's a different subject as to if we want to "switch the default logger" or 
> perhaps "switch to different logging options by default", and that could use 
> some discussion with various folks.  However that is an aside to the pure 
> technical thing of rsyslogd is replacing sysklogd.

Jesse, does it mean that init,conf,logrot. and sysconf file should be
named same?

> 
>