http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/SecondaryArchitectures

Manas Saksena msaksena at marvell.com
Wed Jul 11 05:18:56 UTC 2007


Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 14:42 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>> On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 12:05 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>>>> I'm only suggesting that the packager should need to _look_ at the
>>>> failure before filing the required ExcludeArch bug and pushing a 'ship
>>>> it anyway' button. I'm not saying that we should force them to start the
>>>> build from scratch again like we do at the moment.
>>> I agree.  This is the largest objection I have to the current proposal.
>> This is a significant workflow change. How should we force the packager
>> to look at the failure before letting the packages push?
> 
> Depends on how you look at it really.  It's worth discussion anyway.

I would like to think that if a package has built for an architecture
before in the build system (i.e., we are not talking of the
bootstrapping phase), then subsequent build failures deserve a look
from the package maintainer.

Regards,
Manas




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list