OpenSceneGraph

Rick L Vinyard Jr rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu
Sun Jul 1 18:00:41 UTC 2007


Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 09:47 -0600, Rick L Vinyard Jr wrote:
>   
>> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>     
>>> The devel libs conflict, so the only option I see is installing OSG-2's
>>> devel libs into a %{_libdir}/osg-2.0 subdir.  
>>>       
>> Personally, I'd rather see the OSG-1 libs in an osg-1.0 subdir,
>>     
> This would be incompatible to OSG-1 as it has been shipped until now.
>   
True. But, so is upgrading to OSG-2 (which I think is fine).

>>  and 
>> basically treat the OSG-1 packages as legacy packages. That way, the 
>> OpenSceneGraph package can just move ahead to 2.0 and packages that need 
>> OSG-1 will have to explicitly state it.
>>     
> This is the replacing "OSG-1 by compat-OSG-1 packages" idea. It's only
> applicable to the run-time packages, but not to the devel packages. 
>   
Why is it not applicable to devel packages? There are others that have:
    avahi-compat-howl-devel
    avahi-compat-libdns_sd-devel
    compat-guichan05-devel
    compat-guile-16-devel
    compat-libgda-devel
    compat-libosip2-devel
    compat-wxGTK-common-devel
    compat-wxGTK-devel
    compat-wxGTK2-devel
    compat-wxGTK26-devel





More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list