Re: WTF⁈ ShowOnlyIn=GNOME
chris.stone at gmail.com
Sun Jul 22 22:15:24 UTC 2007
On 7/22/07, nodata <lsof at nodata.co.uk> wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 21.07.2007, 09:18 -0700 schrieb Christopher Stone:
> > On 7/21/07, Naheem Zaffar <naheemzaffar at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Some applications would only be sane in a specific environment. As an
> > > example, Gnome should have a link to Nautilus for file management, KDE
> > > to Konqueror (or whatever they have got in KDE 4. Dolphin?).
> > I do not understand this logic. Why do we assume GNOME users will
> > only use Nautilus, and KDE users will only use Konqueror?
> Of course Gnome users might want to use Konqueror, and they are free to
> do so. But if they know what Konqueror is, then they know how to add a
> launcher to their panel.
> The alternative is what Suse has - a disasterous hard-to-use clutter of
> menu items.
How can one possibly argue that an installed application should not
show up in a users menu?
Somehow if I add a menu entry for an application I installed, it will
make my menu a unusable clutter of Suse mess?
What in the world are you people thinking??
More information about the fedora-devel-list