proposal: new guidelines for rule makers

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le dimanche 03 juin 2007 à 10:20 +0200, Hans de Goede a écrit :
> Nigel Jones wrote:
> > 
> > Now for some figures (these are rough, I'm too lazy to count exactly):
> > ~40-45 packagers owning 30+ SRPMS (10.5%)
> > ~100 packagers owning 10-29 SRPMS (25%)
> > ~70 packagers owning 5-9 SRPMS (17%)
> > ~190 packagers owning 1-4 SRPMS (46%)
> > ~15-20 packagers owning 0 SRPMS (0.5%)
> > (There is 1% missing over the general spread due to rounding and estimates)
> > 
> I do not want to really go here, but if you want todo this in a fair way, try 
> making numbers how many % of the total number of packages is maintained by 
> which group.

And then you can weight the packages by popularity/usefulness, so people
who maintain huge perl collections most people wouldn't care less about
do not get an undue bonus

One guy/gal = one vote is not a perfect rule, but at least it's an
honest one with no special bias (like you get when you start down the
weighted votes path)

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070603/abadab2d/attachment.sig>