Unwanted RPM dependencies

[Jesse Keating]

On Monday 04 June 2007 14:17:11 Stefan Held wrote:
> Would the solution with isolated grub graphics harm anyone?

We have something of a mandate to keep all the trademarked content in one 
package, fedora-logos.  Thus fedora-logos tends to be required by a lot of 
things, but since it drops files into application directories, fedora-logos 
itself requires many things so that there are no unowned directories or so 
that the right application owns it's directories.  This is perhaps one case 
where we can forgo the policy on directory ownership.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070604/37db07b3/attachment.sig>