RFR: GIT Package VCS

[Jesse Keating]

On Thursday 07 June 2007 14:06:10 Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Absolutely -- they have different reasons for wanting this than we do.
>
> Our reasons are:
> 1) Better able to work with upstream
> 2) Better able to rebase our local changes.
> 3) Better able to see how our changes have been modified over time.
>
> However, the solution they arrive at is similar to what we want.  That's
> why looking at it is good.

I think it's important to note that having exploaded trees with patch 
management doesn't exclude generating a srpm with prestine source +patches to 
send into the buildsystem and publish in our source repos.  What we're 
talking about is making it easier to manage the patches on top of the 
prestine source.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070607/16f018de/attachment.sig>