Fedora 8 ideas

Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Thu Jun 7 18:44:15 UTC 2007


Le jeudi 07 juin 2007 à 13:31 -0500, Rex Dieter a écrit :
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> 
> 
> > Alsa is mostly a case of "someone needs to poke RH Legal to check the
> > alsa firmware dumps can be packaged (and if not go ask the hadrware
> > vendors for permission)"
> 
> All Fedora requires is free redistributability.

In the case of alsa you have a huge firmware archive for hardware from
many vendors, with alsa telling you the whole set is GPL, and with many
text files in the alsa archive tracing vendor permissions.

So the question is: do you trust the text files as is? Do they cover all
the firmwares in the archive set? Have any of them incompatible terms?

That's questions for a lawyer, not a packager.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070607/ccb8e5fb/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list