tetex-doc is not noarch?
Neal Becker
ndbecker2 at gmail.com
Fri Jun 8 10:56:04 UTC 2007
Jindrich Novy wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 13:16 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Seems a bit odd:
>> tetex-doc x86_64
>
> Yup, this is odd.
>
> The TeXLive 2007 packages which are now under review:
>
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/229180
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/242416
>
> and splits the TeXLive into two parts just for this reason (the largest
> part -> texmf tree, docs) is noarch and only the binary part, which is
> arch specific, is packaged separately thanks to the better design of
> TeXLive.
>
> The packages are now in a ready-to-use(tm) state and needs review,
> please help with it so that we can get rid of TeTeX soon.
>
> Thanks,
> Jindrich
>
OK, I'll try out the texlive packages. Does this obsolete tetex? Coexist?
IOW, how should I install this on a current FC7 system that already has
tetex?
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list