The updates firehose

[Jesse Keating]

On Saturday 09 June 2007 16:32:07 Christopher Blizzard wrote:
> Are people complaining? 

I don't know.  I can't consume #fedora or fedora-list.  I'm mostly seeking 
opinions with my posting.

> Are we actually breaking stuff in the process? 

Well, we're still not checking for broken deps, so maybe.  Things like 
multilib make this somewhat difficult to detect and prevent pushing, or 
detect and provide a way to deliver just the security ones, etc...  I don't 
really know though, I'm off in rawhide land, but the amount of churn on the 
release makes it feel like rawhide too.

> Are you upset with the amount of bandwith we're eating or just based on
> principal?

Somewhat on principal.  The amount of churn in Extras went somewhat unnoticed 
to me because there wasn't something like bodhi for them.  Now that 
everything goes through it it is very apparent that there is an enormous 
amount of updates issued.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070609/075be3f3/attachment.sig>