The updates firehose
Brian Pepple
bpepple at fedoraproject.org
Sun Jun 10 16:16:26 UTC 2007
On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 12:08 -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Till Maas wrote:
> > On So Juni 10 2007, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> >
> >> I think the ugpradeability is a factor, but I think you've got it wrong.
> >> If every time someone built a change into rawhide, they also pushed a
> >> fix to F-7 for example because there's a new version of <insert popular
> >> app here>, then what's the point in upgrading to F-8 when that's ready?
> >
> > Holding back updates only to make a new release interesting is not a good
> > reason imho. But there are sometimes technical reasons, why updates are done
> > from one release to another. The other way round, when bugs are not fixed
> > with a new update in a current release but left open until the release is end
> > of life is much more annoying imho and causes me more problems than often
> > updates.
>
> But there are always bugs. Are we going to fix every one? We need to
> fix the important ones. I don't think that pulling in every latest
> version is important enough against a release.
+1.
/B
--
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070610/97e21fa1/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list