Fedora and Cross Compiling
Andrew Haley
aph at redhat.com
Wed Jun 13 09:12:10 UTC 2007
Hans de Goede writes:
> Andy Green wrote:
> > Hans de Goede wrote:
> >
> >> You don't get my objectino, I'm crossing from Fedora but not too Fedora,
> >> therefore what is in Fedora's specfile is completely irrelevant. Extreme
> >> example, the sdcc cross-compiler already in Fedora. This crosses from
> >> Fedora to 8051 (and other) microcontrollers. It uses its own assembler
> >> and is its own C-compiler, binutils and gcc are not used at all (except
> >> for building the asm / compiler themselves, duh). Should the sdcc
> >> specfile be a pathc on top of gcc's specfile, a patch effectively
> >> replacing 100% of it, just because its a c-compiler too?
> >
> > Should Fedora packages have to deal with it at all "just because its a
> > c-compiler too?" I think the scenario of striving to be able to build
> > glibc for 8051 on sdcc needs to be triaged into a different discussion.
> >
>
> I'm not talking about building glibc for 8051 (that would be kinda hard as an
> average 8051 comes with 256 bytes of ram, and no I didn't forget an K or M there).
No, that's the 8052, the de luxe version. The 8051 has 128 bytes of RAM...
:-)
Andrew.
--
Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK
Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list