586 kernels.
Benjamin Lewis
ben.lewis at benl.co.uk
Wed Jun 20 22:09:25 UTC 2007
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 04:01:23PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>
>> > Will they need their own spin, or just need to do a reinstall rather than an
>> > upgrade?
>>
>> If we stop building the kernel for them they'll need their own spin.
>>
>
> Dunno about the other 586 users but I'd probably just change distro at
> that point, and since its easier to keep all boxes on one distro probably
> move the lot over, except for the RHEL devel boxes.
>
> Alan
>
>
Sadly, thats probably what I'd do too.
--
Benjamin Lewis
Fedora Ambassador
ben.lewis at benl.co.uk
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://benl.co.uk./ PGP Key: 0x647E480C
"In cases of major discrepancy, it is always reality that got it wrong"
-- RFC 1118
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ben.lewis.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 144 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070620/606a0c7b/attachment.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 889 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070620/606a0c7b/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list