XULRunner - will be or won't be?

[Rahul Sundaram]

Christopher Aillon wrote:

> That makes no sense.  Are you seriously telling me that you ratify 
> changes that may be sub-par with the intent that they can be changed? 

No but policies can be ratified with the understanding that they are not 
written in stone.

> Sounds like you need to revise your ratification process (or lack 
> thereof) before people should feel comfortable following anything that 
> gets "voted" on.

That's a FESCo decision that I am not involved with.

Rahul