RFE: Use generic names in packages

[Jesse Keating]

On Thursday 28 June 2007 23:05:32 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Do you want me to define silly or give an example where I consider it
> silly? I think trying to rename Fedora Directory Server at this point
> would be silly as opposed to the above request which I consider valid.
> Do you disagree with that request or the general idea or both?

I think it should be examined at a case by case basis.  If the content of a 
file is not "Fedora" specific then maybe it should be named generically.  But 
if it /is/ Fedora specific, well then...

I don't think we should be putting a lot of effort into disguising the fact 
that these things are derived from Fedora.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070628/d8fb399b/attachment.sig>