Doing away with 'groups' repo in mock

[Jesse Keating]

On Friday 29 June 2007 08:47:56 Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> I wouldn't ask for one if I knew exactly what each comps tag is
> supposed to mean. notting stealthily dumped a comps dtd in our cvs so
> I suppose it's "official" and could be bundled with rpm/yum (or
> whatever package is supposed to own the comps format). It's not as
> nice as a modern annotated xml/relax-ng schema but it's a beginning.
>
> > We could drop it in as a %doc or example somewhere.
>
> I'd rather it was registered properly in the system xml catalogs so
> xml tools (vim/emacs/libxml...) just know the comps structure.

Again, I'm XML ignorant so all these words... mean not much to me.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070629/0e822b96/attachment.sig>