RFE: Use generic names in packages

[Rahul Sundaram]

Axel Thimm wrote:

> 
> Whether it's "incorrectly" or not is up to the eye of the beholder,
> and FWIW README.distribution is serving neither side of the
> grammar. Or is this package really going to be used in a
> "distribution"? I'm quite sure it will be.

Distribution is just a off hand suggestion. Feel free to come up with a 
better name like others have suggested.

Rahul