Change to U.T.C. based release times

Benjamin Lewis ben.lewis at benl.co.uk
Sun Jun 3 13:39:56 UTC 2007



Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sunday 03 June 2007 09:30:02 Benjamin Lewis wrote:
>   
>> I understand that, but imho local jitter is better than global jitter.
>> Just about everyone knows their offset from UTC, DST or no DST. I know
>> the wiki has the infomation regarding the UTC times from Eastern, but
>> very often this isn't what people - me included - are told when they
>> ask. If I was given an UTC time then there would have been _no_ confusion.
>>     
>
> They _are_ given in a UTC time.  That UTC time may be one hour later / earlier 
> depending on the time of the year, but it is still listed in UTC and you're 
> still able to convert from UTC to your local time.
>   
I'm not denying that - jitter will occur whatever we do. But I do think
an international project should use an international time - Universal
Co-ordinated Time.

-- 

Benjamin Lewis
Fedora Ambassador
ben.lewis at benl.co.uk

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://benl.co.uk./                                 PGP Key: 0x647E480C

"In cases of major discrepancy, it is always reality that got it wrong"
                                                        -- RFC 1118

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ben.lewis.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 144 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070603/79037ddd/attachment.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 889 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070603/79037ddd/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list